The article about Harvey, et al. v. EIP Investment, LLC, et al. noted “The key takeaway from Harvey for remote lawyers is that never setting foot in a state is no guarantee of staying out of its courts,” said Boston professional liability attorney Michael J. Rossi.
“The result of this is that remote practice expands the map of where lawyers can be sued,” Rossi wrote in an email. “Where the lawyer lives or works is no longer the central question. What matters is where the client is and where the lawyer directed their work.”
To read the entire article, visit (subscription required): https://masslawyersweekly.com/2026/11/11/massachusetts-jurisdiction-remote-lawyer-malpractice/
Share with your network:
